Espiello 2025 #2: Memory, Cinema, and the Festival

Inhabiting Oblivion, Preserving Memory

For twenty-two years, Espiello has transformed the Sobrarbe region of the Spanish Pyrenees into a site of cinematic reflection, where ethnographic documentary serves as both a mirror and a bridge. This year’s edition, themed Memoria: Habitando el Olvido (Memory: Inhabiting Oblivion), invites audiences to engage with films that explore the fragility of cultural memory, the ways in which histories are preserved, erased, or reinterpreted, and how communities negotiate their pasts in the present.

Memory, as both a concept and a lived experience, is deeply tied to geography. The landscapes of the Pyrenees hold the echoes of oral traditions, historical migrations, and political struggles. At Espiello, these landscapes intertwine with cinematic narratives, reminding us that memory is not just about the past—it is an ongoing, dynamic process that informs identity, place, and belonging.

This year’s Espiello takes on new urgency as societies worldwide grapple with collective memory and the forces of historical amnesia. Whether through political upheaval, climate change, or urban transformation, communities are continuously renegotiating their relationship to the past. This year’s films serve as testimonies to that process, ensuring that voices, places, and traditions that might otherwise fade into obscurity remain present in the cultural consciousness.

As Sobrarbe welcomes filmmakers, anthropologists, and audiences once again, the festival’s imagined geography takes shape, offering a space where cultures connect through film, discussion, and shared experience.

 

The Imagined Geography of Espiello: A Festival as a Cultural Crossroads

Like previous editions, Espiello 2025 is more than a festival—it is a temporary village, a community built through storytelling. Over the course of ten days, Boltaña becomes a gathering point where the boundaries between local and global, past and present, dissolve. The festival functions as a living ethnographic space, where filmmakers from across the world bring their own landscapes and histories, mapping their experiences onto Sobrarbe’s mountainous terrain.

This ephemeral yet enduring sense of place is what makes Espiello unique. Unlike urban film festivals with sprawling venues and industry-driven programming, Espiello maintains an intimate, community-oriented atmosphere. The festival’s sections—Espiello Pirineos, Espiello d’Arredol, Anvistas, Falorias, and Cachimalla—reinforce a commitment to regional storytelling while connecting with global ethnographic cinema. In each screening and discussion, the festival becomes a meeting ground where different ways of knowing and remembering take center stage.

This year’s theme, Memory: Inhabiting Oblivion, deepens Espiello’s role as a site of historical reflection. What does it mean to inhabit oblivion? How do communities make sense of what has been forgotten or erased? These are not just questions for historians or anthropologists—they are questions for all of us, as individuals and as members of collective identities that are shaped by what we choose to remember.

 

Film Selections: Mapping Memory through Cinema

The official competition lineup features 16 carefully selected documentaries from nearly 500 submissions, each offering a perspective on memory’s role in shaping identity. These films span continents, cultures, and histories, but they are united in their exploration of how memory is woven into the fabric of everyday life.

Here are the selected films for Espiello 2025:

“Sau: la memòria submergida” (Sau: The Submerged Memory) – An exploration of the remnants of a flooded Catalan village, questioning what is lost and what remains when a place disappears.

“Minga en Tenaún” – A Chilean documentary about the minga tradition, in which entire communities come together to move houses across great distances, symbolizing the migration of both people and memories.

“El arte de los analfabetos” (The Art of the Illiterate) – A Spanish film examining oral storytelling traditions and the power of non-written histories in preserving cultural heritage.

“La jeune fille, les chouettes et les hommes lions” – A documentary from Chad that delves into indigenous folklore and its role in environmental knowledge.

“Las Voces del Olvido” (Voices of Oblivion) – A Mexican documentary featuring testimonies of elders whose oral histories challenge official narratives of national history.

“Echoes of the Steppe” – A Kazakh documentary exploring the impact of Soviet collectivization on nomadic communities and how their descendants reconstruct cultural memory.

“Griot Chronicles” – A West African documentary on how oral historians preserve and transmit community identity through music and storytelling.

“The Silence of the Land” – A French-Belgian collaboration investigating the displacement of rural populations due to urban expansion and its effects on generational memory.

“Tattooed Histories” – A Japanese documentary exploring the cultural significance of traditional tattoos as symbols of identity and resistance.

“El Camino del Maíz” (The Path of Corn) – A Guatemalan documentary on the role of corn in Indigenous worldviews and the threats posed by agricultural industrialization.

“Tierra de Nadie” (No Man’s Land) – A documentary from Palestine chronicling how changing borders impact personal and collective memory.

“The Water We Remember” – A Canadian documentary examining Indigenous water protectors and the spiritual connections to ancestral waters.

“Threads of Exile” – A Portuguese film following the stories of exiles from colonial Angola, connecting personal histories to larger political changes.

“La Memoria que Canta” (The Memory That Sings) – A Peruvian documentary about Andean musicians who preserve historical narratives through song.

“Forgotten Names” – A Polish documentary reconstructing family histories lost during World War II through recovered letters and documents.

“Daughters of the Desert” – An Iranian documentary profiling women poets who use literature as an act of defiance and remembrance.

“The Border’s Echo” – A US-Mexico documentary exploring the stories of migrants and how they carry their histories across shifting borders.

Each of these films presents a distinct vision of memory, whether through the landscapes that shape it, the voices that carry it, or the struggles to preserve it in the face of erasure.

The Siñal d’Onor Espiello will be awarded to the Asociación por la Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica de Aragón (ARMHA), recognizing their work in rescuing Spain’s forgotten histories. Meanwhile, Eugenio Monesma, a lifelong documentarian of Pyrenean traditions, receives the Siñal Mayestros, honoring his dedication to cultural preservation through film.

 

Beyond the Screen: Espiello as a Community-Engaged Festival

Espiello is not confined to the darkened theater. It extends into public discussions, artistic exhibitions, and educational workshops that turn the entire region into an immersive learning experience. Among the standout activities this year:

Theatrical Performance – “Olvido” by Biribú Teatro, a play that humorously unpacks the bureaucratic archiving of history, questioning what is remembered and what is left behind.

Exhibitions on Historical Memory curated by ARMHA, including Mujeres Republicanas. Un Sueño Frustrado (Republican Women: A Frustrated Dream) and Una Utopía Necesaria. La Educación en la II República (A Necessary Utopia: Education in the Second Republic).

Cine bajo las Estrellas (Cinema Under the Stars), where selected documentaries will be screened in small villages throughout Sobrarbe, reinforcing the festival’s rural and communal ethos.

Collaborations with the University of Madrid and Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, bringing students and scholars into direct dialogue with filmmakers.

The festival’s commitment to linguistic diversity is evident in the Espiello Agora x l’Aragonés section, celebrating films produced in Aragonese, a language that has fought against historical erasure. The screening of “Baitico, l’ombre-libro de la Valle Bielsa”, documenting one of the last native speakers of the Belsetán dialect, highlights the fragile yet resilient nature of cultural memory.

 

Espiello 2025 as a Living Archive

At its core, Espiello is an archive in motion—a living, breathing documentation of memory, identity, and place. In its twenty-second edition, the festival reaffirms its role as a custodian of intangible heritage, a space where cultures reflect on themselves and on each other through the lens of documentary filmmaking.

As audiences settle into the ochre and black seats of the Palacio de Congresos, the festival’s signature brass mortar sounds, signaling the beginning of another screening, another journey into memory. And for those who participate—filmmakers, scholars, and locals alike—Espiello is not just a festival. It is a communal act of remembering, a place where forgotten stories find voice, and where the past becomes an ever-present guide to the future.

Bienvenidos a Espiello 2025. Let the festival begin.

Espiello 2025 #1: Film, Place, and Cultural Geography

A Festival That Transforms Place

Each spring, in the heart of the Pyrenees, a film festival reshapes the small town of Boltaña into a space of cultural exchange. The Espiello International Ethnographic Documentary Festival is more than a showcase of films; it constructs an imagined geography—a village where filmmakers, scholars, and audiences engage in a shared exploration of human experience.

Since its inception in 2003, Espiello has positioned itself as a bridge between anthropology, filmmaking, and community storytelling. Its name, meaning “mirror” in Aragonés, reflects its function: a space where diverse cultures see themselves and others, engaging in a dialogue about representation, identity, and change. More than just an event, Espiello is an imagined place, a temporary village where cultural narratives are lived, exchanged, and remembered.

The transformation of Boltaña into Espiello reflects a broader pattern seen in temporary cultural geographies, where festivals momentarily reshape the meaning of a location. Just as other major festivals like Sundance or Sheffield DocFest generate alternative mappings of their urban and rural settings, Espiello reconfigures Sobrarbe as a center for cultural dialogue. Unlike large metropolitan festivals, however, Espiello’s impact lingers within a smaller, more intimate environment, where the community actively engages with the narratives it helps to host.

The Imagined Geography of Espiello

Place is more than location; it emerges from relationships, narratives, and lived experiences. Espiello exists beyond the stone walls of Boltaña, shaped by the collective imagination of those who take part. The festival organizers have crafted an imaginary village, mapping out symbolic roles and spaces that give Espiello an identity beyond the physical.

In this village, award-winning filmmakers become “mayors,” jurors serve as “council members,” and festival attendees actively shape the festival’s evolving story. The streets of this metaphorical town are named after past winning documentaries, and every edition of the festival becomes another layer in its growing history. Espiello is both real and symbolic, demonstrating how a cultural event transforms space into a meaningful, participatory geography.

The festival’s spatial dynamics resemble other forms of ephemeral place-making, where temporary events leave lasting impressions on landscapes. While major festivals create short-lived economic hubs, Espiello fosters a cultural memoryscape, a space where storytelling builds upon itself year after year. This approach positions the festival within the broader discussion of how cultural events generate a sense of belonging even in places where participants have no permanent ties.

 

Ethnographic Film as a Medium of Place-Making

Ethnographic documentaries do more than record cultures; they construct interpretations of place, identity, and belonging. The films shown at Espiello offer windows into the lived experiences of people across diverse landscapes, revealing more than their daily lives but the broader cultural, economic, and historical forces that shape them.

Through self-representation, Espiello challenges traditional ethnographic paradigms that have historically relied on outsider perspectives. Instead, the festival prioritizes films where communities tell their own stories, shifting the balance of representation and reinforcing the idea that place is not something to be observed from a distance but experienced and articulated from within.

This approach is significant in a world where cultural narratives are often shaped by dominant media industries. Espiello amplifies voices that might otherwise be overlooked, highlighting rural, Indigenous, and marginalized communities whose stories challenge mainstream assumptions about identity and change. The festival’s commitment to reflexivity ensures that ethnographic film remains a dialogue rather than a static representation, allowing both filmmakers and audiences to critically engage with questions of cultural authenticity and agency.

The role of ethnographic film in mapping cultural landscapes is crucial. The camera functions as an instrument of place-making, capturing and framing realities that are sometimes invisible to those outside of them. Many films presented at Espiello contribute to a collective visual archive, documenting how places evolve, how communities struggle and survive, and how identity is negotiated within changing environments.

 

The Local Impact of Film Festivals: Sobrarbe as a Case Study

Espiello is deeply rooted in the local geography of Sobrarbe. Film festivals, particularly those with an ethnographic focus, have the power to redefine the cultural and economic landscapes of the places that host them. For Sobrarbe, Espiello is more than an annual event—it is a catalyst for cultural engagement, education, and economic sustainability.

Unlike major urban festivals, Espiello brings high-caliber documentary filmmaking to a rural community, demonstrating that cultural events need not be confined to metropolitan centers. It offers an alternative model where film serves as a tool for rural development, bringing tourism, academic engagement, and local pride to an area that has historically been on the margins of Spain’s cinematic and cultural circuits.

Moreover, by integrating educational initiatives, community discussions, and exhibitions, Espiello extends its impact beyond the festival itself. Schools, local organizations, and residents become part of the dialogue, engaging with the themes and films presented. In doing so, the festival strengthens local identity while connecting Sobrarbe to broader conversations about ethnography, representation, and storytelling.

The festival’s impact extends to how Sobrarbe is perceived externally. Just as ethnographic documentaries help frame the cultural identity of distant places, Espiello shapes how the Pyrenean region is understood by audiences far beyond Spain. By curating films that explore not only Sobrarbe’s cultural landscape but also those of similar rural communities across the world, the festival contributes to a re-mapping of place in global cultural networks.

 

Espiello as an Evolving Cultural Geography

Espiello demonstrates that film festivals shape cultural landscapes, serving as spaces of exchange where identities are formed, histories are preserved, and new ways of belonging emerge. By constructing an imagined geography where filmmakers, audiences, and local communities intersect, Espiello expands the meaning of place itself.

It is more than a showcase of ethnographic documentaries; it is an active site where place is made through storytelling, shared experiences, and the ongoing dialogue between tradition and transformation. Espiello reminds us that cinema is not only about representation but about participation—about creating spaces where cultures are not merely observed but actively lived and understood.

For those who attend, Espiello is more than a festival in Sobrarbe. It is a village, a community, an experience—one that continues to grow, adapt, and reflect the world it seeks to illuminate. The imagined geography it creates does not vanish once the festival ends. It lingers in the minds of participants, in the continued dialogue between filmmakers and audiences, and in the evolving identity of the region itself.

The festival offers a model for how temporary cultural spaces leave lasting imprints, shaping the landscapes they inhabit and the communities that participate in them. Espiello, in its ephemeral yet enduring nature, is a testament to the power of film in shaping not only how we see the world—but how we belong to it.

The Gulf of _______: Identity, Power, and the Geopolitics of Place Names

What’s in a Name?

Place names carry power. They encode history, assert identity, and reflect political ideologies. The recent proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America,” championed by former and current U.S. President-Elect Donald Trump, has ignited a heated debate. Trump’s comments, framing the name change as a matter of national pride, were met with a mix of support and ridicule domestically. Internationally, the reaction was more pointed, with Mexico’s new President Claudia Sheinbaum humorously suggesting that the United States be renamed “Mexican America” in a nod to historical maps and shared histories. These exchanges highlight how deeply place names intersect with geopolitics and cultural identity.

Here we explore the implications of such a renaming effort, offering insights into why place names matter and how they shape our understanding of the world.

 

Historical Context of Place Naming

Throughout history, the naming and renaming of places have been tools of power. Colonizers often renamed lands to assert control, erasing indigenous identities and histories in the process. For example, during European colonization, places like New Amsterdam became New York, reflecting shifts in political dominance.

Controversies over place names are not new. The dispute over the “Persian Gulf” versus “Arabian Gulf” exemplifies how naming can become a proxy for larger geopolitical tensions. Similarly, the transition from Macedonia to North Macedonia demonstrates the complexities of balancing national identity and international diplomacy. The Gulf of Mexico—a name steeped in centuries of shared history among the United States, Mexico, and Cuba—is now at the center of a similar debate.

 

Cultural and Political Significance of the Gulf of Mexico

The Gulf of Mexico is more than just a body of water. It is a cultural and economic lifeline for the countries that border it. Its name reflects centuries of shared history, from indigenous civilizations to colonial exchanges and modern trade.

Renaming it the “Gulf of America” would not only disregard its historical and cultural significance but also risk alienating Mexico and Cuba, who have long-standing ties to the region. Such a move could be perceived as an assertion of U.S. dominance, undermining the cooperative spirit that has historically governed the Gulf.

 

Geopolitical Implications of Renaming

Unilaterally renaming the Gulf of Mexico has profound geopolitical implications. It risks being seen as a symbolic act of American exceptionalism, reinforcing perceptions of U.S. hegemony in the region. For Mexico and Cuba, the renaming could be interpreted as a disregard for their sovereignty and historical claims to the Gulf.

International recognition of such a change would be another hurdle. Organizations like the United Nations and the International Hydrographic Organization play a critical role in standardizing place names. Without their endorsement, the new name might remain unrecognized on global maps and documents, further complicating its adoption.

 

Identity and Nationalism in Place Names

Place names are powerful markers of identity. The proposed renaming of the Gulf of Mexico reflects a surge in nationalistic sentiment within the United States. By labeling it the “Gulf of America,” proponents aim to assert a distinctly American identity over a shared geographic feature.

However, this approach risks oversimplifying and overwriting the region’s multicultural heritage. Place names are not merely labels; they are narratives. Changing the Gulf’s name would erase layers of history that connect it to indigenous peoples, colonial powers, and neighboring nations.

 

The Politics of Memory

Renaming a place reshapes collective memory. It reframes history in ways that can either unite or divide communities. The Gulf of Mexico’s current name serves as a reminder of the interconnected histories of the U.S., Mexico, and Cuba. Changing it would disrupt this shared narrative, privileging one perspective over others.

The renaming effort also raises questions about whose history is being remembered and whose is being erased. In an era where there is growing awareness of the need to honor diverse narratives, renaming the Gulf may appear tone-deaf and counterproductive.

 

Comparative Case Studies

The global landscape offers numerous examples of contested or successful place renaming efforts that reveal lessons about identity, power, and reconciliation. For instance:

  1. Burma to Myanmar: This renaming reflects an internal governance shift but remains controversial internationally due to its association with a military regime. It underscores the challenges of achieving global consensus on name changes.
  2. Bombay to Mumbai: India’s renaming of Bombay to Mumbai was part of a broader effort to reclaim indigenous identity while navigating the economic and cultural significance tied to its colonial name.
  3. Sea of Japan vs. East Sea: This ongoing dispute between Japan and Korea highlights how unresolved historical grievances can transform place names into geopolitical flashpoints.
  4. Rhodesia to Zimbabwe: A pivotal change that symbolized decolonization and national identity. While celebrated domestically, it required significant international adaptation.
  5. Derry/Londonderry: In Northern Ireland, this dual naming reflects ongoing tensions between different cultural and political groups, showing how renaming can also act as a compromise to acknowledge contested identities.

These cases illustrate the importance of historical accuracy, cultural significance, and diplomacy in managing naming disputes.

 

The Future of Geopolitical Naming in a Globalized World

In a globalized world, naming disputes are likely to increase as nations seek to assert their identities in an interconnected landscape. Digital maps and global communication further complicate these debates, as the visibility of place names takes on greater significance.

The Gulf of Mexico renaming proposal highlights the need for inclusive and diplomatic approaches to such disputes. Rather than imposing a unilateral change, nations must engage in dialogue to find solutions that honor shared histories and foster cooperation.

 

Gulf of ______

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico—or any prominent geographical feature—is far more than a simple act of rebranding; it is a reflection of deeper power dynamics, historical narratives, and cultural identities. While advocates for the “Gulf of America” name may argue that it asserts national pride, such a change risks sidelining the intricate and shared histories of the region. The Gulf is not merely a U.S. waterway; it is a space of connection, trade, and history among the United States, Mexico, and Cuba.

Critically, this debate reveals how place names serve as both tools of power and repositories of memory. Renaming the Gulf might strengthen certain nationalist narratives, but it could simultaneously erase others, fostering resentment rather than unity. In an interconnected and historically complex region like the Gulf, unilateral actions risk damaging diplomatic relations and disregarding the pluralistic heritage that defines the space.

Ultimately, decisions about renaming geographical features should be approached with caution, sensitivity, and a recognition of the broader implications. Engaging in collaborative, multilateral discussions can help ensure that such changes reflect not only the aspirations of one nation but also the shared histories and futures of all stakeholders. The power of a name lies in its ability to tell a story; in this case, the story of the Gulf of Mexico is one that belongs to many voices, not just one.

 

Does anyone know what this body of water was called before the colonizers arrived?

Geo-Storytelling Course Review: ESRI’s ArcGIS Web App MOOC

Geo-Storytelling Course Review: ESRI’s ArcGIS Web App MOOC

NOTE: This is the first in a series of reviews of courses that we at GIEI think serve well to prepare the geo-storyteller.

ESRI’s ArcGIS Web App MOOC Make an Impact with Modern Geo Apps provides an inspiring introduction to GIS, blending technical skills with tools that enable powerful geographic storytelling. By exploring Instant Apps, StoryMaps, Dashboards, and Experience Builder, participants gain a foundational understanding of how to create engaging, data-driven narratives that foster a deeper connection to place.

In line with GIEI’s mission, this course emphasizes the power of interactive mapping to broaden our geographic awareness and shift how we might perceive the world at all scales. Through these web apps, users can explore, understand, and share complex geographical insights, reinforcing the idea that geography is a shared, ever-evolving conversation.  

Course Highlights

  1. Engaging, Scenario-Based Learning: Each lesson situates GIS skills within real-world contexts, encouraging learners to view data as stories waiting to be told. This aligns with the GIEI’s goal of making geography relevant and relatable, transforming abstract data into insights that connect people with the spaces around them.
  2. A Comprehensive Toolkit for Geographic StorytellingWith ArcGIS’s range of apps, learners can create immersive narratives on diverse topics, from visualizing migration patterns to exploring historical change. Each tool—StoryMaps, Dashboards, Experience Builder—offers a unique way to bring data to life, showing that geography isn’t just about maps, but about sharing experiences that expand our sense of place.
  3. Accessible, Creative InstructionThe course’s step-by-step guidance makes GIS approachable, even for newcomers, while allowing room for creativity. By focusing on the “how” and “why” of each tool, learners gain skills to produce meaningful maps that inspire curiosity and awareness, which are central to the GIEI vision of shared geographic understanding.

Suggestions for Further Enrichment

  1. Advanced Customization: Briefly introducing custom widgets or expressions inspires users to further personalize their apps, offering a glimpse into GIS’s more advanced storytelling capabilities.
  2. Incorporating Real-Time DataUsing real-time data would allow learners to see geography as an active, unfolding story. Adding exercises with live data streams could help illustrate the dynamism of geographic processes, fostering a stronger connection between users and the environments they map.
  3. Supporting Personal ProjectsProviding guidance for those wishing to apply GIS skills to unique projects could empower learners to explore topics relevant to their own lives, communities, or interests—essential for nurturing the curiosity that GIEI promotes.

ArcGIS Apps as Catalysts for Expanding Geographical Imagination

ArcGIS apps do more than teach GIS; they offer platforms for discovery, empathy, and reimagination. By enabling interactive, layered storytelling, these tools allow us to transform geographic data into narratives that help others see the world through new perspectives.

  1. StoryMaps for Layered NarrativesStoryMaps blend maps, multimedia, and narrative to build rich, multi-dimensional stories. For example, a StoryMap could illustrate how a community has evolved over time, connecting viewers with local histories, cultural landscapes, and shifting environments—fostering a renewed awareness of place.
  2. Dashboards for Real-Time ExplorationDashboards allow us to engage with real-time data, making complex information accessible at a glance. Imagine a dashboard tracking changes in urban green space or air quality, inviting viewers to see the cumulative effects of human activity on landscapes. Such insights encourage deeper reflection on human-environment interactions.
  3. Experience Builder for Interactive Exploration:Experience Builder’s customizable, multi-page layouts are perfect for projects that involve detailed exploration. Whether mapping neighborhood art or tracking local species diversity, Experience Builder allows users to create apps that spark curiosity, inviting audiences to participate in geography as a shared inquiry.

Conclusion

The ArcGIS Web App MOOC is more than a technical course; it’s an invitation to reimagine how we interact with geography. Through intuitive exercises and tools that transform data into narrative experiences, this course equips learners to explore, document, and share the world in ways that inspire and connect. The skills developed here foster curiosity, empathy, and a collaborative approach to understanding place.

In learning to use StoryMaps, Dashboards, and Experience Builder, participants gain skills to engage with geography as a living field, where maps are no longer just visuals but powerful storytelling platforms. This course helps us to broaden our geographical imagination, inviting others into conversations that reframe our understanding of landscapes, cultures, and environments as interconnected narratives. In doing so, ArcGIS web apps become not just tools but catalysts for curiosity and connection, inspiring us to see the world through layers of shared meaning and discovery.

Review of The First Book of Rhythms by Langston Hughes

Review of The First Book of Rhythms by Langston Hughes

Langston Hughes’s The First Book of Rhythms, published in 1954 with illustrations by Robin King, invites readers to contemplate rhythm as a universal force connecting all aspects of existence. Though crafted in language accessible to young readers, this book carries a profound wisdom about the nature of rhythm, one that resonates across disciplines, cultures, and natural forms. Hughes presents rhythm as much more than a musical or poetic meter; it is an elemental pattern, a structure, and a flow that animates life itself.

The book opens by inviting readers to draw a line, curve, or wave—introducing rhythm as something that can be seen, felt, and created. Rhythm begins in the movement of a hand on paper, a direct experience that anchors Hughes’s conceptual exploration in the physical body. As the pencil flows, it mirrors the body’s motion, suggesting that rhythm is embodied, inseparable from the physical and sensory experiences of human life. This approach echoes phenomenological theories of perception, like those of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, where understanding arises through engagement with the world. Hughes does not define rhythm in abstract terms; he has readers feel it, subtly linking rhythm to the sensory and intuitive knowledge that grows through experience.

In his descriptions of plants stretching toward the sun, rivers carving through rock, and tides responding to lunar cycles, Hughes reveals rhythm as a structuring principle of nature itself. The book’s sections on “The Rhythms of Nature” and “This Wonderful World” evoke a Romantic vision, akin to Emerson and Wordsworth, who found in nature a living, dynamic order. Hughes captures this order without romanticizing it; rather, he observes rhythm as an empirical reality, an interconnected set of cycles and flows that shape the Earth’s landscapes, waters, and skies. Nature’s rhythms here are not static but dynamic, intertwining with human rhythms in a seamless dance of life. The ecological awareness Hughes instills is subtle but foundational, gesturing toward the later environmental perspectives of ecocriticism, in which nature is seen as a symbiotic system of interdependent rhythms.

Hughes moves fluidly from natural rhythms to cultural expressions, suggesting that human creativity—the rhythm of music, poetry, and dance—draws from the same wellspring as the rhythms of the earth. His chapters on music and dance demonstrate how rhythm becomes a language across cultures, from the drumbeats that echo through African traditions to the steps of Viennese waltzes and square dances. In these sections, Hughes implies that rhythm is not just a cultural artifact but a universal language, a thread that connects diverse traditions. His view resonates with the anthropological concept of mimesis, the imitation of nature in human art, and anticipates structuralist ideas where universal patterns underlie cultural expressions. In Hughes’s view, rhythm bridges the natural and the human, making creativity an extension of nature’s own order.

Hughes’s treatment of rhythm in work and everyday life shows a keen awareness of rhythm’s role in social and economic structures. In “Broken Rhythms” and “Machines,” he examines how rhythm coordinates labor, from the sweeping motions of a scythe to the synchronized rhythms of assembly lines. Hughes contrasts the unique, handcrafted rhythms of traditional labor with the mechanical repetition of industrial machines, subtly critiquing the way mechanized rhythms can flatten human individuality. His language suggests an almost Marxist critique, where industrial rhythms impose an unnatural order, one that distances workers from the natural variations of human labor. This view aligns with ideas of alienation, suggesting that the rhythm of industrial labor has profound effects on the human psyche, disrupting the personal, variable rhythms that characterize handcrafted work.

In “Athletics” and “Furniture,” Hughes considers rhythm in forms that may seem mundane but reveal a broader aesthetic philosophy. He writes of pitchers’ graceful arcs, chairs shaped for comfort, and furniture designed to reflect the rhythms of the body. These examples show Hughes’s understanding of rhythm as not only functional but beautiful, aligning with a modernist aesthetic where form follows function. In every detail, Hughes sees rhythm as a harmony between form and purpose, a principle that unites aesthetic beauty with practical design. The chairs, cups, and clothes become, in Hughes’s vision, everyday manifestations of rhythm’s pervasive influence.

Robin King’s illustrations enhance this sense of rhythmic unity with simple yet evocative forms—curves, spirals, and waves that echo the natural and human-made shapes Hughes describes. The images mirror Hughes’s language, capturing the fundamental forms of rhythm in visual terms. There is an elegance in their repetition and symmetry, and like Hughes’s text, they suggest a Bauhaus-inspired understanding of design as rooted in universal forms.

In the final chapters, Hughes turns to the abstract and unseen rhythms of modern science—radio waves, electromagnetic fields, and atomic patterns. He marvels at these invisible rhythms, linking them to the visible rhythms of nature and daily life. This perspective resonates with the theories of rhythms in modern physics, where vibrations and cycles underpin the smallest particles of matter. Hughes’s fascination with the “unseen rhythms” anticipates a world in which technology reveals dimensions of rhythm that were once hidden from view. This closing contemplation, grounded in the technological marvels of the 20th century, opens the book outward, connecting the most elemental rhythms of the human body with the vast, unseen rhythms of the universe.

The First Book of Rhythms is thus more than an exploration of rhythm; it is a poetic treatise on the interconnectivity of life, nature, and culture. By blending the rhythmic patterns of nature, the arts, and everyday objects, Hughes creates a vision of the world as a unified field of rhythmic interaction, one that crosses boundaries of time, space, and culture. In doing so, Hughes crafts a timeless meditation on the patterns that bind the world together, patterns that echo across scales and disciplines, from the grand cycles of the cosmos to the delicate touch of pencil on paper.

Ugly Geographies

Ugly Geographies

The practice of using TikTok and Google Earth for virtual exploration, as seen in Natasha Gupta’s content, offers a novel approach to geographic engagement, particularly for younger audiences. The format taps into the aesthetics of social media, making geography visually appealing and relatable. However, it risks reducing the complexity of geography to superficial observations. In the process, geographic landscapes are reduced to binary judgments—”ugly” or “not ugly”—which may perpetuate a shallow understanding of place. This simplified perspective overlooks the deeper, often invisible, forces that shape our physical and human environments, including history, culture, politics, and economics.

For The GIEI, Gupta’s method poses both an opportunity and a challenge. On the positive side, her videos have sparked interest in geography by making it accessible and fun, opening up conversations about regions that may not receive much attention otherwise. By bringing millions of viewers into contact with places as varied as France, the Philippines, and Ohio, these explorations counteract cultural biases that often paint certain locations as undesirable or unworthy of study.

Yet, from a critical geographical perspective, the main drawback is the oversimplification of places into a visual binary, void of context. While aesthetic judgments are natural human reactions, reducing geography to what’s pleasing to the eye overlooks the multi-dimensional character of place. Geographers understand that landscapes are not just shaped by natural beauty but also by human intervention, history, economic forces, and the lived experiences of people. A “bland” roadside hotel, for instance, might tell a fascinating story about globalization, tourism, or urban sprawl that a quick, dismissive glance cannot capture.

Moreover, this TikTok practice relies on first impressions and instinctual reactions, which could reinforce stereotypes or misconceptions. For example, classifying an area based on weather conditions or architectural style risks perpetuating narrow views of regions, potentially overlooking the broader geographic significance of those areas. For geography educators, this raises important questions about the responsibility of digital content creators in shaping public perceptions of the world.

A more enriched version of this method, aligned with the goals of critical geography, would encourage viewers to dig deeper. Instead of focusing solely on visual aesthetics, users could explore questions like: What economic activities shape this landscape? What is the cultural or political significance of the place? How do migration patterns or historical events impact this environment? By incorporating these dimensions, the practice could become a powerful educational tool that fosters a more nuanced understanding of the world, even at its “ugliest.”

While Gupta’s TikTok practice of exploring the world via Google Earth provides an engaging starting point for geographic inquiry, it has limitations in fostering critical geographic thinking. The challenge lies in harnessing the popularity of such trends to encourage deeper engagement with geography—moving beyond surface-level judgments and towards a more comprehensive understanding of the spatial processes that shape our world.

For a lesson that engages with more critical ways of using Google Earth and TikTok, check out this idea on Asking the World.